A key Los Angeles Metropolis Council committee on Wednesday rejected an effort to freeze rents citywide, however superior a sequence of eviction protections for folks economically affected by latest fires.
In a 3-1 vote, the Housing and Homelessness Committee accepted a movement that will bar landlords from evicting tenants for quite a lot of causes, together with for nonpayment of lease or if an proprietor needed to maneuver right into a unit. Such evictions could be prohibited just for tenants who have been economically harmed by the fires, and the prohibition would final one yr.
The movement heads to the total Metropolis Council, the place it’s unclear it has the votes to go.
A earlier model of the proposal, which included a citywide lease freeze along with the eviction protections, was heard final week at council, however was despatched again the committee amid fears amongst some council members that each the lease freeze and eviction protections have been too broad.
Because the fires broke out Jan. 7, there have been of , however it’s unclear simply how a lot rental costs as a complete have risen throughout the area.
Housing and catastrophe restoration specialists have mentioned they anticipate lease to extend to , as a result of hundreds of houses have been destroyed in an already tight market.
Most houses misplaced seem like single-family homes, and due to that some specialists mentioned they anticipate lease to rise most in bigger items adjoining to burn areas, with upward strain on prices diminishing as items turn out to be smaller and farther away from the catastrophe zone.
The council has taken some steps to guard tenants. On Tuesday, it gave to a proposal that will ban landlords from evicting tenants for permitting folks or pets displaced by final month’s fires to dwell with them.
On Wednesday, Housing and Homelessness Committee members rejected the lease freeze regardless of pleas from tenants and their advocates on the assembly.
Committee members as an alternative superior the eviction protections. Voting in favor of that proposal have been Councilmembers Adrin Nazarian, Ysabel Jurado and Nithya Raman, the committee chair.
Councilmember Bob Blumenfield voted no and expressed concern the eviction protections have been too sweeping, a sentiment landlords and their representatives shared on the assembly.
As an alternative, Blumenfield mentioned he’d just like the council to discover giving tenants who’re economically affected by the fires a grace interval to pay lease.
